Curse

Kadamony · Aug 16, 2006, 05:51 PM // 17:51

*ATTENTION DEV TEAM*
A lot of people have accomplished a lot with more than one role-playing character. A title that I wish was implemented is that you have *unlocked all skills in the game* or campaign. I have unlocked everything in Tyria with 4 characters, and am in the process of doing it for Cantha. I'm sure there could be more titles that would work better with account-scope than just character-scope.

lyra_song · Aug 16, 2006, 06:08 PM // 18:08

/signed for a UAX title.

/signed for more titles that are account based.

gamecube187 · Aug 16, 2006, 06:22 PM // 18:22

/signed for more account related titles, because, there really isn't enough....

Xeno Breaker · Aug 16, 2006, 07:27 PM // 19:27

Skill hunter, treasure hunter, wisdom title .... these should be account based as well. I have multiple characters and i have capped all their respective skill with them. I see no reason for one single character to have all game elites considering that character wont have any non elite skills to back them up. Same with treasure hunter and wisdom, having multiple characters means i open chests with all of my characters and id them when i find them.

my 2 cents

Sir Mad · Aug 16, 2006, 08:53 PM // 20:53

Titles are already too easy. The easier the less respected.

/not signed

inscribed · Aug 16, 2006, 08:58 PM // 20:58

/signed
For the last time, making titles account based does not make them easier. You still have to do the exact same work, except you can use different characters while achieving the title. Titles should reflect the achievements of the player, not the individual character.

/signed again

Kakumei · Aug 16, 2006, 09:16 PM // 21:16

I am wholeheartedly against making current titles account-based.

icedragon981 · Aug 16, 2006, 09:21 PM // 21:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xeno Breaker

Skill hunter, treasure hunter, wisdom title .... these should be account based as well. I have multiple characters and i have capped all their respective skill with them. I see no reason for one single character to have all game elites considering that character wont have any non elite skills to back them up. Same with treasure hunter and wisdom, having multiple characters means i open chests with all of my characters and id them when i find them.

Excatly what I would have said.

/signed

Dirty Panda · Aug 16, 2006, 09:29 PM // 21:29

/signed x 10000000000

Stupid Shizno · Aug 16, 2006, 09:47 PM // 21:47

/notsigned

your mesmer killed glint, not your monk, so why should your monk be the protector of tyria once your mesmer does it all?

your warrior did the chest runs, not your ele. why should your ele wear the title?

glads/hero are account based since pvp orienated titles can be made with pvp chars.

Melrel · Aug 16, 2006, 10:14 PM // 22:14

The only ones I agree on are the Skill Hunter, Treasure Hunter and Wisdom titles, espically the Skill Hunter because I don't fancy capping all the elite skills again when I've already unlocked them all.

The truth itself · Aug 16, 2006, 10:14 PM // 22:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Death3D

/notsigned

your mesmer killed glint, not your monk, so why should your monk be the protector of tyria once your mesmer does it all?

your warrior did the chest runs, not your ele. why should your ele wear the title?

glads/hero are account based since pvp orienated titles can be made with pvp chars.

Because we all love to to everything 6 times.

sky the unstopable · Aug 16, 2006, 10:26 PM // 22:26

/signed

this would lean the title system tword apprciating the skill/time investment of the player not the character. only title dont like for account wide is drunkard.

Zui · Aug 16, 2006, 10:52 PM // 22:52

/signed for more account-based titles

/signed for UAX, and UAX per campaign titles

Thom Bangalter · Aug 16, 2006, 10:55 PM // 22:55

/signed for uax titles (i may actually unlock those craptastic elite spirits now)

/signed for more account-based titles

/signed with a fake name for uax titles

Mars Dragonblade · Aug 16, 2006, 11:20 PM // 23:20

/Signed for all.

Terra Xin · Aug 17, 2006, 01:21 AM // 01:21

the character based titles are designed to represrent the accomplishments of that character and the skills that you used that accomplished that title. In all honesty, the skill hunter/wisdom/treasue hunter title tracks are not that hard to master, you just need to stop being so lazy and get with it. Titles are meant to be earned, and not just given to you across the board when one character does all the work.

Don't you guys think that having multiple titles is just as much of an accomplishment, or do you really think that just because your character is level 5 and has mastered a title is going to get alot of false respect?

arbiter · Aug 17, 2006, 02:36 AM // 02:36

/signed

The skill hunter title is absurd imo, its a total waste of time to cap EVERY elite skill for every profession on just one character. If the wisdom and chest hunter titles were accord based then you wouldnt be stuck switching over items so they can be idented on a specific title.

And drunkard title only counts for one? that seems odd, why would it even matter which character got drunk, it seems like it should count for all

Kakumei · Aug 17, 2006, 02:38 AM // 02:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by arbiter

/signed

The skill hunter title is absurd imo, its a total waste of time to cap EVERY elite skill for every profession on just one character. If the wisdom and chest hunter titles were accord based then you wouldnt be stuck switching over items so they can be idented on a specific title.

And drunkard title only counts for one? that seems odd, why would it even matter which character got drunk, it seems like it should count for all

Wow wow wow wow

Are all of you missing the point? The titles aren't to show what YOU can do, they're designed to show HOW MUCH you love a SPECIFIC character.

And that drunk thing doesn't even make sense there guy. If any of them deserve to be character-based, it's that one; not all your characters got drunk, only one of them did.

Dr Strangelove · Aug 17, 2006, 03:03 AM // 03:03

A UAX title is a good idea, but changing the character based titles now to account is pointless. Skill Hunter account based? That's like saying if you buy a skill for one character it should be available to all of them (PvE). For the chest running titles, why should you havea character who didn't do the runs get the title? The only reason some titles are account based is because they are for PvP characters, which are routinely created and destroyed. If they weren't account based, no one would have them.